Archives For collaboration

Lucy Bernholz

Philanthropy trends expert Lucy Bernholz gave 10 predictions for philanthropy in the next decade, and I had two and a half thoughts on two of them.

Structured disaster relief: More attention to preparation, less reliance on raising money instantly.

My reaction: Preparation must be flexible, and the planning document must be brief. You don’t want the plan gathering dust on shelf, and in fact you want everyone in your organization to have memorized the plan. That means it needs to be short.

Scaling up through a network: As in the nodes on the Internet, or “small pieces loosely coupled.” (This made me think of David Weinberger’s Small Pieces Loosely Joined: A Unified Theory Of The Web.)

My reaction: Nonprofits should continue to think of partnerships, collaborations, and loose affiliations with other organizations. It can mean more efficient and effective service delivery, and it helps avoid competition for limited donations.

My half reaction: Lucy alluded to the strange and wonderful things that happen when people act as groups. For those wanting to study this, a good research-starting keyword is emergence—the analysis of group outputs that can’t be predicted from the qualities of the individuals in the groups. A fun place to start is The Ants by Bert Holldobler and E.O. Wilson.

Let me know what you think.

Share

Jay Connor.

It turns out my sophomore-level public policy students could teach some nonprofit professionals how to count.

Or rather, what to count. As donors demand accountability for results, should nonprofits count services delivered or lives changed? Definitely the latter, according to nonprofit collaboration expert Jay Connor, founder of The Collaboratory for Community Support and author of Community Visions, Community Solutions: Grantmaking for Comprehensive Impact (St. Paul: Wilder Publishing Center, 2003), which lucky Midlands Nonprofit Summit-goers (including yours truly) got for free at his inspiring morning keynote hosted by the Nonprofit Association of the Midlands.

As Connor writes in that book (please bear with the lengthy excerpt, it’s good stuff):

To respond to the problem of measuring impact, the nonprofit, philanthropic, and government sectors have turned to “outcomes” evaluation. This is a step forward from previous approaches to evaluation, which simply counted activities—the number of people attending a job-training class, the percentage of county land set aside for parks, the number of kids participating in an after-school arts program. Recognizing that these tallies do not tell much about whether services are changing people’s lives for the better, funders have begun to request that their grantees provide them with measurements of the outcomes achieved–the attitudes and behaviors that change as a result of grantee services, not just who uses the services (p. 11). Continue Reading…

Share